Compare the efficacy of each provider's approach to patient interviewing in regard to effect on patient behavior

To prepare:

Watch a video of two providers interviewing a patient.

· Video demonstrates example of standard interviewing techniques versus example of motivational interviewing (MI) using The Process of MI framework:

· Engage – Build rapport, use open-ended questions, uncover values/hopes, and offer compassionate reflections.

· Focus – Bring the discussion to the health concern at hand, eliciting symptoms, concerns, and wellness indicators.

· Evoke – Explore reasons for and against change; use readiness rulers, double-sided reflections, and pros/cons.

· Plan – Collaboratively set attainable goals and elicit patient commitment to specific next steps.

Assignment (1–2 pages)

Compare the efficacy of each provider's approach to patient interviewing in regard to effect on patient behavior. Which approach is more effective in helping patients achieve health-related behavioral changes?

· Explain how motivational interviewing (MI) differs in tone, structure, and patient engagement compared to traditional interviewing.

· Reflect on how you might use MI techniques in your own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes.

· Consider how principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice apply to patient interviewing and communication practices.

Use at least 3 scholarly resources that are less than 5 years old. Cite all sources in APA format.

NURS_6512_Module1_Assignment1_Rubric