Conduct peer reviews on two student submissions

Your review should be substantive, constructive, and respectful. When reviewing, address the following:

a. Clarity and Organization: Is the executive summary clearly written and easy to follow? Does it provide a logical flow from background to significance to key issues?

b. Content and Analysis: Are the key issues (e.g., administrative barriers, policy challenges, program impact) well explained? Does the study connect to interagency collaboration and social service integration? Does the summary highlight why the initiative is important for criminal justice administration?

c. Use of Sources and Evidence: Are at least three peer-reviewed sources used appropriately? Do the sources support the claims? Is APA 7 format applied correctly?

d. Constructive Feedback: Identify strengths and areas for improvement.